Published: 2020-09-29

Oliceridine — a unique drug among opioid analgesics

Medical University Lublin
oliceridine opioids pain tolerance

Abstract

Oliceridine is an opioid with a different mechanism of action compared to classical opioid agonists, e.g. morphine, as it does not act through active metabolites and activates the β-arrestin pathway to a small extent, thereby reducing dangerous side effects and broadening the therapeutic window. This is particularly important as, despite the wide availability of drugs from various therapeutic groups, the effectiveness of analgesics in many patients remains low. Oliceridine is a novel and effective analgesic providing rapid analgesia, with a favourable safety and tolerability profile concerning respiratory and gastrointestinal adverse effects compared to morphine, and may provide a new treatment option for patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain where an intravenous opioid is required.

Introduction

The treatment of pain is a significant challenge in modern medicine, particularly as sustained pain diminishes patients’ quality of life. In addition, the lack of effective pain treatment may cause accompanying symptoms, such as anxiety, depression, reduced physical/mental performance, and limited social relationships. Therefore, there is a need to identify new analgesic substances with fewer side effects [1].

It is well known that conventional opioids have a narrow therapeutic window, with similar doses exerting the desired therapeutic effects as well as causing adverse effects [2], which is mainly related to their mechanism of action. At the cellular level, they bind to μ-opioid receptors (MOR) belonging to G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and non-selectively activate two crucial intracellular signalling pathways: the G-protein pathway, associated with analgesia, and the β-arrestin pathway, associated with opioid-related adverse effects and feedback inhibition of G-protein-mediated analgesia observed as receptor desensitisation. Therefore, the analgesic effect is proportionally combined with adverse effects [3], hence, there is a significant unmet need for a predictable and powerful analgesic with improved safety and tolerability compared with currently available therapies.

Aim

This manuscript provides an overview of the information regarding oliceridine, a new selective opioid drug. The work was based on a review of international literature contained in PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science literature databases and limited to the English or Polish language.

Mechanism of action of oliceridine versus opioids

When classical opioids bind to MOR, the conformation changes detach the Gα and Gβ subunits of the heterodimeric G-protein. The Gα subunit inhibits the activity of adenylate cyclase, reduces the production of cyclic AMP (cAMP) and activates downstream signalling pathways, while the Gβ subunit inhibits voltage-gated calcium channels. Modulation of pre- and postsynaptic calcium channels causes a reduced influx of Ca2+ ions into the cell while reducing neuronal excitability, which is exacerbated by the blockage of sodium channels and TRPV1 (transient receptor potential vanilloid 1) channels [1,4]. When stimulated by an agonist, GPCR can activate many G-protein molecules, and if unchecked, leads to the uncontrolled stimulation of cell signalling pathways. The processes that follow activation of the PCRR leading to the inhibition of its catalytic activity (called desensitisation) are regulated by the so-called β-arrestins. They belong to the group of cytosolic proteins that "arrest" the residues involved in G-protein binding, prevent the attachment of subsequent G-protein subunits to the receptor and their activation [5]. In this way, they prevent excessive activation of the receptor, leading to the suppression of the transmitted signal, but are also responsible for the occurrence of side effects, as evidenced in β-arrestin 2 knockout mice which exhibited enhanced analgesia while significantly reducing levels of respiratory depression and constipation following morphine administration [3-7]. Therefore, it is now believed that MOR ligands, which primarily activate the G-protein pathway, by showing limited β-arrestin2 recruitment may be more effective therapeutic agents with preserved analgesia and reduced side effects [8,9]. It should be also emphasised that the weaker receptor desensitisation due to its decreased level of β-arrestin2-mediated internalisation reduces the adverse effects of GPCR agonists, slows down the development of tolerance to analgesic effects and improves the patient's quality of life [8]. The ability of these ligands to activate one selected signalling pathway has been defined as "functional selectivity", “collateral efficacy”, or “biased agonism” [10-14]. A new drug belonging to this group with an atypical chemical scaffold is TRV-130 (also known as oliceridine) that acts as a full agonist for G-protein activation but exhibits markedly reduced β-arrestin recruitment than conventional opioids [15-18].

Unique pharmacological effects

Oliceridine is characterised by rapid brain penetration which is consistent with the lipophilicity of the drug, achieving the peak analgesic effect at 5 minutes after administration compared with 30 minutes for morphine, but the duration of action for both drugs is similar, that is, approximately 90 minutes. Behavioural experiments in rodents also revealed that oliceridine has 3–10 times greater analgesic activity [15]. In a tail-flick assay, it was a 4-fold more potent analgesic than morphine, with less tolerance and opioid-induced hyperalgesia after 4 days of administration of increasing doses [19] or 3-day repeated administration, indicating a lack of tolerance development to the analgesic effect [20], whereas in the hot plate test, oliceridine was 10-fold more potent than morphine [21]. Moreover, experiments in mice models indicated that oliceridine did not worsen allodynia or gait disturbances after trial fractures in contrast to morphine [19,22].

Initially, the analgesic properties of oliceridine in rodents were considered similar to those of morphine. However, this compound induced fewer side effects, especially on the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract without the development of tolerance to its analgesic effect [23,24]. The lack of tolerance for analgesic effects of oliceridine is of therapeutic importance because even long-term use does not require an increasing dose to achieve the desired therapeutic effect, which also significantly reduces the potential side effects [19].

Therapeutic application

The promising results from behavioural studies led to controlled open-label trials, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of oliceridine for the management of moderate to severe pain following bunionectomy (APOLLO-1) [23] or abdominoplasty (APOLLO-2) [25].

In the APOLLO-1 study, effective analgesia was observed for oliceridine at a dose of 0.1, 0.35 and 0.5 mg, however, the analgesic effect comparable to morphine was observed after treatment by two higher doses. In this trial, the respiratory safety burden showed a dose-dependent increase across oliceridine regimens (mean hours: 0.1 mg: 0.04; 0.35 mg: 0.28; 0.5 mg: 0.8) but none were statistically different from morphine (1.1). Likewise, adverse effects observed as gastrointestinal adverse reactions were also induced by oliceridine in a dose-dependent manner [23].

In the APOLLO-2 study, oliceridine at the dose of 0.35 and 0.5 mg showed a favourable safety and tolerability profile regarding respiratory and gastrointestinal adverse effects in comparison to morphine. Likewise, the respiratory safety burden showed a dose-dependent increase after oliceridine treatment (mean hours: 0.1 mg: 0.43; 0.35 mg: 1.48; 0.5 mg: 1.59) in comparison to 1.72 for morphine. Gastrointestinal adverse events induced by oliceridine also increased in a dose-dependent manner but the effects were lower than for morphine [25].

Moreover, in these two pivotal efficacy studies in hard- and soft-tissue surgical models, oliceridine demonstrated a rapid (2–5 minute onset of action after intravenous administration) analgesic efficacy statistically significant vs. placebo [23,24]. Thus, oliceridine may provide an important new treatment option for the management of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Additionally, high skin-permeation of oliceridine suggests the possibility of research in terms of its use via a transdermal patch [15].

Metabolism

Additionally, unlike classical opioids, oliceridine undergoes hepatic metabolism to the inactive metabolites TRV0109662 and M22 [26,27] via the action of cytochrome P450 isoenzymes (CYP3A4 and CYP2D) during oxidation and finally, glucuronidation. Most metabolites are excreted in the urine, some with faeces. Meanwhile, it is well known that classical opioids act through active metabolites excreted by the kidneys, which may lead to their accumulation and damage to nephron structures. Due to the different metabolism of oliceridine, it can be safely used in patients with renal failure without dosage adjustments. However, considering the hepatic metabolism of this compound, it is necessary to reduce its dose in severe liver failure [17,27].

Side effects and precautions

The first clinical trials in healthy volunteers showed less pronounced side effects compared to classical opioids, demonstrating that oliceridine was safe and well-tolerated in a medically heterogeneous patient population, including the elderly, obese, and patients with comorbid conditions such as diabetes and sleep apnoea. The most common adverse reactions were nausea, vomiting, dizziness, headache, constipation, pruritus, and hypoxia [27]. Cardiovascular side effects such as lowered blood pressure and reduced heart rate were dose-dependent [18]. It should be emphasised that the prolongation of the QT interval in the ECG recording and respiratory depression were risk factors against the approval of oliceridine [28]. Unfortunately, although oliceridine may be safer than conventional opioids, prevailing evidence suggests that it will retain opioid-like abuse-related effects particularly during repeated treatment [20,21,29].

Additionally, special attention should be paid in the case of prolonged use of oliceridine during pregnancy, since it can result in neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome [30]. Furthermore, concomitant use with benzodiazepines or other CNS depressants, including alcohol, may result in life-threatening complications such as profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and even death [31]. Moreover, oliceridine is contraindicated in patients with significant respiratory depression, acute or severe bronchial asthma in an unmonitored setting or the absence of resuscitative equipment, known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction and hypersensitivity to oliceridine.

Finally, oliceridine was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in adults for the management of acute pain severe enough to require an intravenous opioid analgesic and for whom alternative treatments are inadequate.

Summary

Currently, opioid analgesics are of great importance in medicine and their associated side effects do not exclude them from basic pharmacotherapy of high-intensity pain. However, oliceridine is a promising new analgesic drug with unique functional selectivity ("biased" agonism) which allows the therapeutic effect to be separated from the side effects previously considered inextricably linked to the mechanism of opioid action. Therefore, it may offer new therapeutic possibilities as a more effective and safer compound, especially for patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain requiring an intravenous opioid.

References

  1. Stein Christoph. Opioid Receptors. Annual Review of Medicine. 2016; 67(1)DOI
  2. Sadhasivam Senthilkumar, Chidambaran Vidya. Pharmacogenomics of opioids and perioperative pain management. Pharmacogenomics. 2012; 13(15)DOI
  3. Bohn Laura M., Lefkowitz Robert J., Gainetdinov Raul R., Peppel Karsten, Caron Marc G., Lin Fang-Tsyr. Enhanced Morphine Analgesia in Mice Lacking β-Arrestin 2. Science. 1999; 286(5449)DOI
  4. Corder Gregory, Castro Daniel C., Bruchas Michael R., Scherrer Grégory. Endogenous and Exogenous Opioids in Pain. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2018; 41(1)DOI
  5. Szymiczek M., Kurowska E., Gorczyca W.A.. Rola arestyn w sygnalizacji wewnatrzkomórkowej [Role of arrestins in intracellular signaling]. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2005; 59:324-333. PubMed
  6. Maguma Hercules T., Dewey William L., Akbarali Hamid I.. Differences in the characteristics of tolerance to μ-opioid receptor agonists in the colon from wild type and β-arrestin2 knockout mice. European Journal of Pharmacology. 2012; 685(1-3)DOI
  7. Raehal Kirsten M., Walker Julia K. L., Bohn Laura M.. Morphine Side Effects in β-Arrestin 2 Knockout Mice. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2005; 314(3)DOI
  8. Cheng Jian-xin, Cheng Tao, Li Wei-hua, Liu Gui-xia, Zhu Wei-liang, Tang Yun. Computational insights into the G-protein-biased activation and inactivation mechanisms of the μ opioid receptor. Acta Pharmacologica Sinica. 2017; 39(1)DOI
  9. Raehal KM, Bohn LM. β-arrestins: regulatory role and therapeutic potential in opioid and cannabinoid receptor-mediated analgesia. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2014; 219:427-443. DOI | PubMed
  10. Bohn LM. Selectivity for G protein or arrestin-mediated signaling. In: Neve K. Functional Selectivity of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Ligands. Humana Press; 2009:71-85.
  11. Kenakin Terry. New Concepts in Drug Discovery: Collateral Efficacy and Permissive Antagonism. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 2005; 4(11)DOI
  12. Kenakin Terry. Biased agonism. F1000 Biology Reports. 2009; 1DOI
  13. Mailman Richard B.. GPCR functional selectivity has therapeutic impact. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2007; 28(8)DOI
  14. Urban Jonathan D., Clarke William P., von Zastrow Mark, Nichols David E., Kobilka Brian, Weinstein Harel, Javitch Jonathan A., Roth Bryan L., Christopoulos Arthur, Sexton Patrick M., Miller Keith J., Spedding Michael, Mailman Richard B.. Functional Selectivity and Classical Concepts of Quantitative Pharmacology. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2006; 320(1)DOI
  15. DeWire Scott M., Yamashita Dennis S., Rominger David H., Liu Guodong, Cowan Conrad L., Graczyk Thomas M., Chen Xiao-Tao, Pitis Philip M., Gotchev Dimitar, Yuan Catherine, Koblish Michael, Lark Michael W., Violin Jonathan D.. A G Protein-Biased Ligand at the μ-Opioid Receptor Is Potently Analgesic with Reduced Gastrointestinal and Respiratory Dysfunction Compared with Morphine. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics. 2013; 344(3)DOI
  16. Manglik Aashish, Lin Henry, Aryal Dipendra K., McCorvy John D., Dengler Daniela, Corder Gregory, Levit Anat, Kling Ralf C., Bernat Viachaslau, Hübner Harald, Huang Xi-Ping, Sassano Maria F., Giguère Patrick M., Löber Stefan, Da Duan, Scherrer Grégory, Kobilka Brian K., Gmeiner Peter, Roth Bryan L., Shoichet Brian K.. Structure-based discovery of opioid analgesics with reduced side effects. Nature. 2016; 537(7619)DOI
  17. Nafziger Anne N., Arscott Kelly A., Cochrane Kristina, Skobieranda Franck, Burt David A., Fossler Michael J.. The Influence of Renal or Hepatic Impairment on the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Oliceridine. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development. 2019; 9(5)DOI
  18. Viscusi Eugene R., Webster Lynn, Kuss Michael, Daniels Stephen, Bolognese James A., Zuckerman Seth, Soergel David G., Subach Ruth Ann, Cook Emily, Skobieranda Franck. A randomized, phase 2 study investigating TRV130, a biased ligand of the μ-opioid receptor, for the intravenous treatment of acute pain. PAIN. 2016; 157(1)DOI
  19. Liang De-Yong, Li Wen-Wu, Nwaneshiudu Chinwe, Irvine Karen-Amanda, Clark J. David. Pharmacological Characters of Oliceridine, a μ-Opioid Receptor G-Protein–Biased Ligand in Mice. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2019; 129(5)DOI
  20. Altarifi Ahmad A, David Bethany, Muchhala Karan H, Blough Bruce E, Akbarali Hamid, Negus S Stevens. Effects of acute and repeated treatment with the biased mu opioid receptor agonist TRV130 (oliceridine) on measures of antinociception, gastrointestinal function, and abuse liability in rodents. Journal of Psychopharmacology. 2017; 31(6)DOI
  21. Austin Zamarripa C., Edwards Shelley R., Qureshi Hina N., Yi John N., Blough Bruce E., Freeman Kevin B.. The G-protein biased mu-opioid agonist, TRV130, produces reinforcing and antinociceptive effects that are comparable to oxycodone in rats. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2018; 192DOI
  22. Gan T.J., Wase L.. Oliceridine, a G protein-selective ligand at the mu-opioid receptor, for the management of moderate to severe acute pain. Drugs of Today. 2020; 56(4)DOI
  23. Gan T.J., Wase L.. Oliceridine, a G protein-selective ligand at the mu-opioid receptor, for the management of moderate to severe acute pain. Drugs of Today. 2020; 56(4)DOI
  24. Viscusi Eugene R, Skobieranda Franck, Soergel David G, Cook Emily, Burt David A, Singla Neil. <p>APOLLO-1: a randomized placebo and active-controlled phase III study investigating oliceridine (TRV130), a G protein-biased ligand at the µ-opioid receptor, for management of moderate-to-severe acute pain following bunionectomy</p>. Journal of Pain Research. 2019; Volume 12DOI
  25. Pedersen Mie Fabricius, Wróbel Tomasz Marcin, Märcher-Rørsted Emil, Pedersen Daniel Sejer, Møller Thor Christian, Gabriele Federica, Pedersen Henrik, Matosiuk Dariusz, Foster Simon Richard, Bouvier Michel, Bräuner-Osborne Hans. Biased agonism of clinically approved μ-opioid receptor agonists and TRV130 is not controlled by binding and signaling kinetics. Neuropharmacology. 2020; 166DOI
  26. Singla NK, Skobieranda F, Soergel DG, Salamea M, Burt DA, Demitrack MA, Viscusi ER. APOLLO-2: A Randomized, Placebo and Active-Controlled Phase III Study Investigating Oliceridine (TRV130), a G Protein-Biased Ligand at the μ-Opioid Receptor, for Management of Moderate to Severe Acute Pain Following Abdominoplasty. Pain Pract. 2019; 19(7):715-731. DOI | PubMed
  27. Fossler Michael J., Sadler Brian M., Farrell Colm, Burt David A., Pitsiu Maria, Skobieranda Franck, Soergel David G.. Oliceridine (TRV130), a Novel G Protein-Biased Ligand at the μ-Opioid Receptor, Demonstrates a Predictable Relationship Between Plasma Concentrations and Pain Relief. I: Development of a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2018; 58(6)DOI
  28. Soergel David G., Ann Subach Ruth, Sadler Brian, Connell John, Marion Alan S., Cowan Conrad L., Violin Jonathan D., Lark Michael W.. First Clinical Experience With TRV130: Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Healthy Volunteers. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2014; 54(3)DOI
  29. Negus S. Stevens, Freeman Kevin B.. Abuse Potential of Biased Mu Opioid Receptor Agonists. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences. 2018; 39(11)DOI
  30. Trevena Announces FDA Approval of OLINVYK™ (Oliceridine) Injection. https://www.newsbreak.com/pennsylvania/chesterbrook/news/1615528848077/trevena-announces-fda-approval-of-olinvyk-oliceridine-injection.
  31. William Elliott, James Chan. Oliceridine Injection. Internal Medicine Alert. 2020; 42(17)