Ascertaining of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with clinical and instrumental methods in the group of young adults
AbstractIntroduction. During the diagnostic process, the clinical examination of the masticatory system combined with jaw movement measurements can indicate the presence of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) symptoms. Aim. The aim of the present study was to determine the presence of clinical symptoms of TMD in a group of subjects aged 19–27 years and to analyze the measurable parameters obtained from examinations carried out using the Arcus®digma.Material and methods. Eighty four dentate subjects from 19 to 27 years were recruited from students. Objective signs were studied with Helkimo Anamnetic index (Ai) and the subjective symptoms were evaluated with Gsellmann’s Occlusal Index (OI). Functional examination of the masticatory system was performed using Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction index (Di). Pain symptoms were determined in clinical examination using visual analogue scale. Software of Arcus®digma allowed the analysis of Bennett’s angle and movement, the horizontal condylar inclination, retrusion, anterior guidance and Immediate Side Shift.Results. Occasional pain occurred in 39% of students and correlated with increase of OI index, subjects with higher Di displayed higher values of OI. Comparison of Bennett’s angle values for the right and left TMJ showed the significant asymmetry, similarly like the values of Bennett’s movement and retrusion between the left and right TMJ.Conclusions. Bennett’s angle, Bennett’s movement and retrusion were significant parameters in instrumental evaluation of TMD symptoms. The questionnaire and clinical examination supplemented with axiographic recordings revealed the presence of TMD symptoms in students who were not fully aware of TMJ disorders.
Masumi S, Kim YJ, Clark GT. The value of maximum motion measurements for distinguishing between common temporomandibular disorder subgroups. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002;93(5):552–559.
Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1998.
Gsellmann B, Schmid-Schwap M, Piehslinger E, Slavicek R. Lengths of condylar pathwaysmeasured with computerized axiography (Cadiax®) and occlusal index in patients and volunteers. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25:146–152.
Seedorf H, Seetzen F, Schulz A, Sadat-Khonsari MR, Kirsch I, Jude HD. Impact of posterior occlusal support on the condylar position. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:759–763.
Stiesch-Scholz M, Demling A, Rosbach A. Reproducibility of jaw movements in patients with craniomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:807–812.
Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. II. Index foranamnestic and clinical dysfunction and ecclesial state. Swed Dent J. 1974;67:101–121.
Helkimo M. Studies on function and dysfunction of the masticatory system. III. Analyses of anamnestic and clinical recording of dysfunction with the aid of indices. Swed Dent J. 1974;67:165–182.
Ash MM, Nelson SJ. Wheeler's Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion. 8th ed. St Louis: Saunders; 2003.
Inui M, Fushima K, Sato S. Facial asymmetry in temporomandibular joint disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 1999;26:402–406.
Celar AG, Tamaki K. Accuracy of recording horizontal condylar inclination and Bennett angle with the Cadiax compact. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:1076–1081.
Baqaien MA, Al-Salti FM, Muessig D. Changes in condylar path inclination during maximum protrusion between the ages of 6 and 12 years. J Oral Rehabil. 2007;34:27–33.
Johnson A., Winstanley RB. Recording sagittal condylar angles using a mandibular facebow. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:904–908.
Tsuruta A, Hamada K, Hanada K, Koyama JI, Hayashi T, Hosogai A et al. Comparison of condylar positions at intercuspal and reference positions in patients with condylar bone change. J Oral Rehabil. 2004;31:640–646.
Yang Y, Yatabe M, Ai M, Soneda K. The relation of canine guidance with laterotrusive movements at the incisal point and the working side condyle. J Oral Rehabil. 2000;27:911–917.